Identify
Keep the full model name and version in the file.
How the index works, and the boundaries of its evidence.
Use original documentation wherever possible. Preserve the exact claim, source address, access date, model, market and version. Explain when a source is incomplete or ambiguous.
Label documentation reviews as source analysis. A physical test report must identify its sample, method, equipment, dates and limitations. No hands-on scores are currently published.
Manufacturer images are labeled as such. They are used to identify products and do not demonstrate that a sample was inspected.
Any future sample provision or commercial relationship must be disclosed in the relevant article. This publication currently has no affiliate checkout links or paid rankings.
Material revisions should record the date, statement changed and supporting source. Readers should be able to distinguish a new conclusion from a simple wording correction.
Keep the full model name and version in the file.
Record the source, its publisher and the context.
Distinguish published statements from measurements.
State what remains unknown and what a test would need.
Check local acceptance rules and operator instructions before handing over an electronic device.
A practical checklist for separating a website’s name from evidence of who operates it.
Sample identity, a recorded method and clear limitations come before a defensible conclusion.